Appeals court overturns verdict in
undercover sting of Democratic operatives
The D.C. Circuit tossed out a $130,000 judgment against conservative operative James O’Keefe.
08/21/2026 05:09 PM EDT
A federal appeals court handed conservative activist James O’Keefe a significant legal victory Friday, tossing out a $130,000 judgment a Democratic consultant won against him over an undercover video sting tied to the 2016 presidential election.
The D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals said that award, which followed a 2022 jury trial, violated the First Amendment by muddling together the consequences of legal activity by O’Keefe and his group, Project Veritas, with unlawful aspects of its infiltration of the consulting firm, Democracy Partners.
The video, which Project Veritas released weeks before the 2016 general election, contended that Democracy Partners and its founder, Robert Creamer, were seeking to foment violence at Republican presidential nominee Donald Trump’s rallies. The presentation included footage obtained by Project Veritas operative Allison Maass who, the court said, lied about her identity in order to get an internship with the firm and surreptitiously record audio and video of meetings.
The video caused a minor stir at the height of the hard-fought presidential campaign, prompting a mention from Trump during a debate with Hillary Clinton. Creamer, the husband of Rep. Jan Schakowsky (D-Ill.), denied provoking violence, but the Democratic National Committee severed ties with him and his firm.
Creamer and his firm sued Project Veritas and O’Keefe, claiming illegal wiretapping, trespass, breach of fiduciary duty and fraud. At the 2022 trial, a federal jury in Washington awarded Creamer $120,000 for fraudulent misrepresentation. The jury also found the conservative activists liable for wiretapping, with a judge awarding $10,000 for that claim.
The case, like other suits over O’Keefe’s video stings, raised questions about the extent of First Amendment protections for undercover reporting based on subterfuge or deceit. Such tactics are currently rare in mainstream journalism, but as recently as the 1980s and 1990s, hidden-camera stories were a staple of some TV news shows and occasionally involved ruses.
In the ruling Friday, D.C. Circuit Judge Karen Henderson, a George H.W. Bush appointee, said the publication of the videos taken by Maass had no immunity under the First Amendment.
“Maass obtained that footage by subterfuge and the jury found that her conduct amounted to fraud,” Henderson wrote, joined by Judge Harry Edwards, a Carter appointee. “Maass infiltrated Democracy Partners on assignment from O’Keefe; just as she had no First Amendment right to gather this footage, he had no First Amendment right to publish it.”
James O’Keefe, who started a new hidden-camera venture after being ousted from his role with Project Veritas in 2023, celebrated the win and said it will help him fight other lawsuits he faces from targets embarrassed by his reports.
“There are no words to describe the magnitude of this victory. It legitimizes and legalizes undercover reporting that I do,” O’Keefe said in an interview. “The First Amendment would be worth very little if the government could not punish a news story directly, but a jury could simply tally up the political and financial consequences of that story and send the journalists the bill.”
An attorney for Creamer and Democracy Partners, Joseph Sandler, said his clients were discussing how to proceed. “We of course are disappointed in the ruling and do not believe the appeal was correctly decided; and are evaluating next steps,” Sandler said via email.
Related Tags
Legal
Project Veritas
James O'Keefe
POLITICO Forecast
Global power is in flux. Your daily guide to what comes next.
POLITICO Forecast
Your Email
Employer
Employer
By signing up, you acknowledge and agree to our Privacy Policy and Terms of Service . You may unsubscribe at any time by following the directions at the bottom of the email or by contacting us here . This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Sign Up
* All fields must be completed to subscribe
Post a Comment